Voices in Urban Education
Archives
Beyond Brown v. Board
VUE Number 4, Summer 2004
| VUE Home | Archives | Order Print Copy |
EXCERPT:
A Different Shade of Segregation: A Puerto Rican Educator Considers the Legacy of Brown
By Ricardo Dobles
Ricardo Dobles is a former
Senior Associate at the Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
> Author's biography
The Brown-era civil rights struggle was fueled by relations between Black and White Americans. Since then, immigration has made our nation's ethnic and racial mix more complex. For Latino students twenty years ago, when the author attended school, and today, in a largely Latino city in Massachusetts, Brown has limited relevance. Most young Latinos remain in separate and unequal schools.
The first time I seriously considered
the significance of Brown v. Board of
Education was as a first-year doctoral
student at the Harvard Graduate
School of Education. I am sure that
somewhere in my previous academic
experiences I had come across this landmark
civil rights case. However, I could
not for the life of me remember it. As a
result, every time my professors referred
to Brown (always just “Brown” and
always with the assumption that no
further explanation was needed), I felt
the pangs of insecurity that come with
being conscious of one's ignorance.
Afraid that I was the only person
in the room not entirely familiar with
Brown v. Board of Education, I of course
never asked for further explanation
of the legal decision. Instead, I sought
out the most remote corner of the
library and read about preceding court
cases, like Plessy v. Ferguson, and, finally,
Brown itself.
My immediate reaction to this historic
Supreme Court case that declared
segregation in schools unlawful was that
it made perfect sense that I was not
familiar with the decision; it seemed to
have no relevance or resemblance to my
own educational experience. I understood
why I had relegated this extraordinarily
significant civil rights case to
the furthest recesses of my educational
memory. Why would I be expected to
know the history of this case when I
was clearly neither the intended nor
indirect beneficiary? This decision was
about the legal separation of Black and
White students. Puerto Rican students,
in particular, and Latinos, in general,
were certainly not a part of the racial
equation in 1954.
My second thought upon learning
about Brown was: If that ruling ended
segregation, it was news to me. As an
elementary and middle school student
in Brooklyn, New York, in the 1970s, I
went to school in a very diverse district
District 14 which included Puerto
Ricans, African Americans, Italians,
Poles, and Hasidic Jews. Yet, when I
went to school every day at P.S. 224
and, later, at I.S. 71, my classmates were
almost all Puerto Rican. A few blocks
away, I.S. 318 housed predominantly
African American students. The Italians
and Poles, I assume, went to their own
schools, although I cannot say where
with any certainty, because I barely had
any contact with them. Hasidic students,
with whom we shared a city block,
were the only other ethnic group I saw,
but our education was segregated; in
the morning, we all walked to school
“together,” then they went into their
school building and we into ours.
For me, then, segregation was a
way of life, twenty years after Brown.
No wonder I knew so little about the
decision. And my experience is not
unique. According to the Civil Rights
Project at Harvard, the typical Latino
student attends a school in which more
than half of the students are Latino and
only a fourth are white; and Latinos
are most segregated in the Northeast
(Orfield & Lee 2004). Clearly, the legacy
of Brown for the Latino community
is complicated.
© all material AISR